Weple

Before you fix anything, know what's at risk

Code Review

A developer with 25 years of experience reviews outsourced or AI-built code and flags the risks first

Whether code that runs today still runs in six months is usually clear after one read-through.

When you don't know if you can trust this code

Code you got from an outside team, built quickly with AI, or inherited from a developer who left runs fine right now. But whether you can build more on top of it, ship it, or acquire the team behind it is something you only know by reading it. Running and sound are not the same thing.

What we look at

  • Structure and maintainability

    We check whether the structure holds up when you add one more feature and whether a person can still read it in six months. We flag the places that will trip you up later.

  • Security vulnerabilities

    We hunt for the things that turn into incidents: leaked keys, permissions left open, unvalidated input, outdated dependencies.

  • Performance bottlenecks

    We point out slow queries, needless loops, and structures that buckle as they grow. The spots that are fine now but blow up as users pile on, we catch in advance.

  • The problems specific to AI-built code

    It runs on the surface but the error handling is empty, the same logic is copied all over, and nobody has verified whole sections: we look hard at exactly those.

The review report

We sort what we found by severity. Where the risk is, why it's risky, and what to fix first, in order. Written so you can set priorities the moment you finish reading. If there's nothing risky, we write that too.

How to start

  1. Send the code

    Give us read access to the repository or a zip file, and tell us if there's a part you're especially worried about.

  2. The review

    We read the code across structure, security, performance, and maintainability, and pull together the risky spots.

  3. Report and walkthrough

    We hand you a report with a severity and priority on each item, and if you'd like, we get on a call to point out what to fix first.

A good fit for

  • Anyone who wants to check an outsourced deliverable before accepting it
  • Teams checking code built fast with AI before investing or launching
  • Anyone inheriting a departed developer's code and having to carry it forward

Frequently asked questions

Do we have to hand over the code?
Read access to the repository or a zip file is enough. We don't need write access, and we clean up our access once the review is done.
Do you fix what you find too?
This service covers finding the issues and writing them up. If you want the fixes as well, we carry on as General Fixes or per-job development.
How long does it take?
It depends on the size of the codebase. We look at the repository first, then set and tell you the scope and timeline.

Find out whether the code is one you can trust

Send us the repository or a zip file and the part you're most worried about, and we'll start by mapping out the scope of the review.

See all services